WASHINGTON — The American Soybean Association and Plains Cotton Growers, Inc., argued before the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals on Dec. 8 in American Soybean Association v. EPA (D.C. Cir. 20-1441). The two groups urged the court to clarify jurisdictional rules under FIFRA and to require the Environmental Protection Agency to use the best available science when evaluating dicamba pesticide registrations and potential impacts to species protected under the Endangered Species Act.
The groups filed the lawsuit against EPA in November 2020 on the five-year registration for the use of dicamba on dicamba-tolerant soybeans and cotton. Growers argued EPA’s flawed approach led the agency to impose arbitrary and overly burdensome buffers and application cutoff dates, which have harmed grower operations. The agency’s arbitrary requirements have forced many growers to take land out of agricultural production, prevented their ability to use important practices like double-cropping, and made it more difficult to control damaging herbicide-resistant weeds, among other harms.
Alan Meadows, American Soybean Association Regulatory Committee Chairman and a soybean grower from Halls, Tennessee, said, “Growers need herbicides like dicamba to protect crops and maintain important conservation practices, for example, reduced tillage. By failing to use good science and data, EPA is unnecessarily making the farmer’s job harder and hurting our bottom line. We are hopeful the court will agree and require the agency to redo these assessments using the science and data it has available.”
“Producers need a vast array of tools at their disposal as they strive to maintain a healthy crop while also adopting conservation practices as good stewards of the land,” said Kody Bessent, Plains Cotton Growers Chief Executive Officer. “A nationwide arbitrary cutoff date imposed by EPA could prevent a grower from making a timely application of weed control product, negatively affecting their bottom line.”
ASA and PCG are asking the court to remand these portions of the registration back to EPA for reconsideration with the direction to use the science and data available to the agency. The groups are hopeful the court will rule on this matter in the coming months.
–American Soybean Association
Plains Cotton Growers, Inc.
RECOMMENDED ARTICLES
COLUMBUS, Ohio — In October 2021 I was a guest on a popular podcast to discuss my recently published book, “Seed Money: Monsanto’s Past and Our Food Future,” which examines the agribusiness giant’s influence on the global food system. After the show, I got a lot of calls from around the world, but one really […]
WASHINGTON — The following statements were released following the EPA’s announcement that annual production requirements for ethanol and other biofuels would be lowered to account for reduced demand as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The EPA also announced that requests by small oil refineries to be exempted from ethanol requirements would be rejected. More […]
MINNEAPOLIS — Multiple herbicide-resistant soybeans such as XtendFlex (resistant to dicamba, glyphosate, and glufosinate) and Enlist E3 (resistant to 2,4-D choline, glyphosate, and glufosinate) have created the opportunity for post-emergence “over-the-top” application of growth regulators (dicamba and 2,4-D choline) to soybean. However, off-target damage to sensitive soybean from these herbicides is widespread in Minnesota and […]
LEXINGTON, Ky. — There have been several reports of dicamba off-target movement onto soybean and other sensitive crops reported over the last two weeks in parts of Kentucky. Despite four years of applicator training and three label changes to enhance restrictions and nullify the potential of off-target movement of dicamba during postemergence applications to dicamba-tolerant […]
COLUMBUS, Ohio — Spring is a common time for farmers to deal with pesticides and insecticides, but this spring the legal system has also been busy with pesticides and insecticides. Important legal developments with dicamba, glyphosate, and chlorpyrifos raise questions about the future of the products, with proponents on both sides pushing for and against their […]
