NEW YORK — New York Farm Bureau has filed an amicus curia brief in support of the Bronx Zoo and its efforts to push back against animal rights activists who are suing to free the elephant named Happy and grant the animal a human right. If successful, this precedent setting ruling would have dire consequences for animal agriculture in the state and our food system.
The New York State Court of Appeals is hearing arguments in the case today [May 18] on whether the elephant should be afforded habeas corpus relief. Habeas corpus relief is a right given to a person who is seeking relief from being illegally imprisoned or restrained in their liberty.
The Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. (NRP) argues that the elephant possesses mirror self-recognition and therefore identifies with key traits of self-awareness. It concludes that because the elephant has self-awareness, the animal has self-autonomy which cannot be exercised while being kept in a zoo. NRP would like the elephant to be moved to an animal sanctuary—another confined area of space.
New York Farm Bureau submitted an amicus curiae brief in support of the Respondents (Breheny on behalf of the Bronx Zoo) arguing habeas corpus relief is not proper as it is well established case law that an animal is not a person nor is the elephant being illegally imprisoned.
In the brief, we argue that not only would this devastate animal agriculture, but it would also raise constitutional issues for humans surrounding unlawful takings, seizures, and impairments of contracts. If this precedent were to be set, it has the potential to create a litany of issues as it relates to animal agriculture.
“The agricultural industry should not be exposed to the wave of habeas petitions that NRP invites and that would swamp New York courts. Worse, if any of those habeas petitions succeed in securing the release or transfer of livestock, the livelihoods of agriculturalists and their suppliers would be destroyed. The downstream effects also would be serious. If NRP has its way, the livestock on which people in New York, in the United States, and around the world depend for sustenance, would be released from their alleged “imprisonment” and could no longer be raised for food in New York,” reads the brief, in part.
New York Farm Bureau CEO Liz Dribusch said, “New York Farm Bureau has taken a great interest in this case and believes it is imperative that we standup for our members who are involved in animal food production. All farm animals deserve to be well-cared for in humane conditions but giving an animal the right of a human, essentially freeing animals in confinement, is a giant step too far. We are hopeful the New York State Court of Appeals will thoroughly review all of the evidence and previous court rulings and make the only reasonable decision, to deny the elephant habeus corpus relief.”
Click here to read NYFB’s Amicus Curia Brief.
You may find the stream on the New York Court of Appeals website: https://www.nycourts.gov/
–New York Farm Bureau
RECOMMENDED ARTICLES
COLUMBUS, Ohio — Let’s hope the marriages that began at Stoney Hill Farm in southwestern Ohio fare better than the wedding barn where they started. Yet another lawsuit over the Stoney Hill wedding barn has ended in an adverse ruling for the owner. The Second District Court of Appeals recently upheld a permanent injunction that for […]
WASHINGTON — Should Californians be able to require higher welfare standards for farm animals that are raised in other states if products from those animals are to be sold in California? The U.S. Supreme Court will confront that question when it hears oral argument in National Pork Producers Council v. Ross on Oct. 11, 2022. Pork […]
COLUMBUS, Ohio — An appeals court ruling now stands in the way of a bikeway project begun more than 27 years ago by the Mill Creek Metropolitan Park District (MetroParks) in Mahoning County. The Seventh District Court of Appeals recently ruled that MetroParks did not have the power of eminent domain when it attempted to acquire […]
OKLAHOMA CITY — The Oklahoma Farm Bureau Legal Foundation recently joined 20 other state Farm Bureaus to file an amicus curiae – or “friend of the court” – brief in support of the petitioner in the Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency United States Supreme Court case review. Background Now spanning more than a decade, Sackett v. EPA focuses […]
